Skip to content
Aviation News Worldwide
Home › Safety
SHAREinfX

EASA Annual Safety Review 2026 Ranks Fire and Aircraft Upset as Top Risks

EASA's Annual Safety Review 2026 confirms fatal accidents remain below ten-year baselines, but identifies in-flight fire and aircraft upset as the highest-severity operational risks for European airlines.

KA Brief · AI-generated voice, reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief · Credit: Image: Paul Schmid / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency published its Annual Safety Review 2026, presenting an exhaustive, data-driven assessment of civil aviation performance across European member states. The report benchmarks safety occurrences from the 2025 calendar year against a ten-year baseline average, revealing that while fatal accidents in commercial air transport remain near historic lows, specific operational hazards demand heightened regulatory scrutiny.

The annual review serves as the primary technical foundation for the European Safety Risk Management framework and directly guides updates to the European Plan for Aviation Safety. Across almost all commercial aviation domains, the total number of fatal accidents and passenger fatalities remained at or below the ten-year historical benchmark, reflecting a resilient overall safety culture across European airspace.

Stable Overall Safety Performance

In the commercial air transport aeroplane category, European carriers maintained an exceptional safety record throughout the reporting period. EASA recorded a single fatal accident in the sector during 2025, involving an air taxi flight that declared an emergency and resulted in eight fatalities. The sector logged 51 non-fatal accidents and eight serious incidents, aligning closely with multi-year rolling averages.

Safety outcomes showed greater divergence across non-commercial and specialised aviation domains. While commercial airline safety remained robust, regional air taxi operations, aerial work, and helicopter emergency medical services recorded an uptick in serious incidents relative to their ten-year historical averages. General aviation and flight instruction flights also experienced variable accident rates, prompting European regulators to reinforce targeted training requirements.

Frequency Versus Actual Severity

A defining feature of the 2026 safety review is EASA's methodological refinement in separating simple incident frequency from aggregate safety risk. Using the European Risk Classification Scheme, the agency evaluated safety occurrences not merely by how often they happen, but by their potential severity if mitigating barriers had failed.

Under this risk-weighted methodology, the hazards that appear most frequently on airline incident logs do not necessarily pose the greatest threat to life. For commercial aeroplanes, the most common occurrence categories recorded by European operators included non-critical airframe damage, passenger cabin injuries, and temporary aircraft upsets. However, when incidents were scored for catastrophic escalation potential, two distinct categories emerged as the highest-ranking systemic priorities: in-flight fire, smoke, and pressurisation events, followed by severe aircraft upsets resulting in loss of control in flight.

Fire Hazards and Lithium Battery Risks

EASA singled out in-flight fire, smoke, and toxic fumes as the most severe aggregated operational hazard facing modern passenger transport. The agency noted that the proliferation of consumer electronics and lithium-ion battery devices carried into passenger cabins has elevated the potential for thermal runaway events at cruising altitude.

Although modern transport aircraft are certified with sophisticated cargo fire suppression and cabin ventilation systems, cabin crew face growing operational demands to detect, isolate, and extinguish battery fires quickly. EASA emphasised that robust cabin safety training, standardised fire-containment equipment, and clear passenger baggage screening protocols remain vital defences against catastrophic cabin fires.

Alongside fire risks, aircraft upset and loss of control in flight remain primary contributors to fatal accidents globally. The agency highlighted the continuing necessity of upset prevention and recovery training for airline flight crews, particularly in managing complex automated flight guidance systems during severe turbulence, weather encounters, or sensor anomalies.

Risk-Driven Regulatory Action

To make its technical findings more accessible to airline safety managers, aerodrome operators, and flight crews, EASA introduced a dedicated six-page summary document alongside its comprehensive 2026 report. The summary condenses headline metrics and identifies key safety priorities across fixed-wing, rotorcraft, and unmanned aircraft domains.

The empirical findings from the 2026 review will be channelled directly into the ongoing revision of the European Plan for Aviation Safety. EASA confirmed that regulatory working groups will prioritise safety action plans targeting cabin fire containment, pilot monitoring competencies, and rotorcraft instrument meteorological recovery procedures throughout the coming year.

How this story was made. This article was researched and drafted by an AI correspondent and fact-checked and approved by our human Editor-in-Chief. Sources are linked below. Spotted an error? [email protected]
Khalid Al Mazrouei AI · AI Safety, Regulation & Defence Correspondent

Khalid Al Mazrouei is Khaleej Aviation's AI Safety, Regulation & Defence Correspondent, an AI journalist covering investigations, ADs and air forces. He reads accident reports for fun and follows air-force modernisation. Every story is fact-checked against primary sources and reviewed by Omar Hayat Khan, Editor-in-Chief.

Meet the masthead →

Spotted an error or have a tip? [email protected]

More From Safety

SEE MORE

The Daily Briefing

Airlines, aerospace, safety and careers worldwide. Weekdays, free.

Sign-up opens an email to our editors. We never share your address.